The Democracy Ninja Score (DNS) measures how effectively a political figure protects, strengthens, or undermines democratic systems.
Where the American Proletariat Score focuses on economic and lived outcomes, the Democracy Ninja Score focuses on power, process, and the integrity of democracy itself.
The Democracy Ninja Score measures whether a leader plays fair, protects the system, and respects the will of the people—or manipulates power to control outcomes.
Each individual receives a final score from 0 to 100.
80–100 → Strong defender of democratic systems
60–79 → Generally supportive, with notable flaws
40–59 → Mixed or inconsistent commitment to democracy
20–39 → Regularly undermines democratic norms
0–19 → Actively erodes or manipulates democratic systems
Each score is calculated across five categories, weighted equally unless otherwise specified.
What it measures:
Commitment to free, fair, and accessible elections.
Key indicators:
Support for secure and accessible voting systems
Acceptance of legitimate election results
Opposition to voter suppression tactics
Position on gerrymandering and fair maps
Core question:
Do they respect elections—even when they lose?
What it measures:
Respect for legal systems, courts, and democratic institutions.
Key indicators:
Compliance with court rulings
Respect for checks and balances
Avoidance of political interference in legal processes
Support for independent institutions
Core question:
Do they operate within the system—or try to bend it?
What it measures:
Relationship to truth, facts, and public communication.
Key indicators:
Accuracy of public statements
Willingness to correct misinformation
Transparency in decision-making
Use (or abuse) of media and messaging
Core question:
Do they inform the public—or manipulate them?
What it measures:
Adherence to unwritten rules that sustain democracy.
Key indicators:
Peaceful transfer of power
Respect for opposition parties
Avoidance of authoritarian rhetoric
Willingness to compromise
Core question:
Do they treat opponents as legitimate—or as enemies?
What it measures:
How power is acquired, used, and protected.
Key indicators:
Personal vs public use of power
Ethical conduct and conflicts of interest
Resistance to authoritarian consolidation
Accountability when mistakes are made
Core question:
Do they use power responsibly—or exploit it?
Each pillar is scored on a 0–20 scale, then combined into a total score out of 100.
Scores are based on:
Public actions and statements
Voting records and executive decisions
Legal and ethical conduct
Documented behavior over time
Real-world consequences of leadership
The Democracy Ninja Score does not measure:
Political ideology (left vs right)
Policy agreement
Popularity or electability
A candidate can score:
High while being conservative or liberal
Low while being popular or successful
This is intentional.
Because the most dangerous threats to democracy are not always loud.
They are:
Subtle
Incremental
Procedural
They happen through:
Small rule changes
Quiet norm-breaking
Gradual power consolidation
The Democracy Ninja Score is designed to detect those patterns early—before they become irreversible.
A functioning democracy is the foundation for everything else:
Economic opportunity
Civil rights
Public trust
When democratic systems weaken, every other outcome becomes less stable.
The Democracy Ninja Score exists to answer a simple but critical question:
Is this person strengthening democracy—or weakening it?
The Democracy Ninja Score evaluates leadership through one lens:
Do they protect the system that gives people power—or do they take that power for themselves?
Because once democracy is compromised, everything else follows.