Salt Lake City v. 10 Comparable Cities

Ranked from worst comparison → strongest competitor

10. Anchorage, Alaska

Anchorage is the least comparable.

It’s isolated, the airport is mostly regional (or long-haul specific), and the economy is limited. There is some queer presence, but it’s not a lifestyle-forward city in the same way.

Why SLC wins: accessibility, economy, culture, and basic livability.

9. Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tulsa tries hard—remote worker incentives, affordability—but it still lacks a strong cultural or political center. The queer community exists but isn’t prominent.

Why SLC wins: stronger identity, better long-term trajectory, more visible community.

8. Omaha, Nebraska

Omaha is stable and underrated, but it’s quiet in a way that borders on stagnant. Limited national draw, smaller queer footprint, and less momentum.

Why SLC wins: more growth, more migration, more relevance.

7. Albuquerque, New Mexico

Albuquerque has affordability and culture, but struggles with consistency—safety perception, economic unevenness, and weaker infrastructure.

Why SLC wins: cleaner growth, more stability, stronger job base.

6. Spokane, Washington

Spokane is closer than people think—affordable, growing, decent access to nature. But it lacks scale, and its proximity to Seattle overshadows it.

Why SLC wins: stronger independent identity, better airport, more economic weight.

5. Bozeman, Montana

Bozeman is beautiful and booming, but it’s become extremely expensive relative to what it offers. It lacks infrastructure and scale.

Why SLC wins: far better value, more complete city, better access and diversity.

4. Boise, Idaho

Boise is the most direct “lite version” of Salt Lake City.

But it’s smaller, less diverse, and politically less dynamic. Housing is no longer cheap, and the airport is more limited.

Why SLC wins: scale, diversity, stronger political and cultural shift.

3. Kansas City, Missouri

Kansas City is underrated—more liberal than expected, good cost of living, decent economy.

But it’s sprawling and lacks the same geographic advantages (mountains, proximity, compactness).

Why SLC wins: tighter lifestyle, better natural access, stronger migration momentum.

2. Las Vegas, Nevada

Vegas is a real competitor.

• strong airport (one of the best on this list)

• visible queer community

• no state income tax

• growing economy

But it’s chaotic. The lifestyle is less stable, and long-term livability can feel uneven.

Why SLC wins: stability, safety, structure, and sustainability.

1. Denver, Colorado (Strongest Competitor)

Denver is the closest match—and the hardest to beat.

It has:

• strong queer visibility

• major airport

• established tech scene

• outdoor lifestyle

But it’s expensive now. And it feels saturated.

Why SLC wins:

better entry point

Salt Lake City gives you a similar lifestyle without the same financial barrier or competition pressure.

Final Ranking 

Anchorage, AK

Tulsa, OK

Omaha, NE

Albuquerque, NM

Spokane, WA

Bozeman, MT

Boise, ID

Kansas City, MO

Las Vegas, NV

Denver, CO

Blunt Take

Salt Lake City wins this list because it is:

the most balanced city in this tier

Not the biggest.
Not the most exciting.

But the one where:

• things work

• money stretches

• and the future still feels open

Recommended Articles

• Should You Move to Salt Lake City as a Liberal in 2026?

• The Cost of Living Lie: SLC v. NYC v. LA

• I Moved from Manhattan to Utah — Here’s the Truth

• The Most Liberal Cities in Utah (Ranked)

• American Proletariat Profile: John Curtis